Civil Procedure I
Changing Venue
There are three ways for defendants to change the venue of a suit:
Transfer of Venue
Transfer of venue moves a case from one court to another within the same court system.
- Convenience of parties and witnesses
- Most important factor
- Interests of justice
- Private factors:
- Where the claim arose
- Location of physical evidence like documents and property
- Whether a forum selection clause involved
- Public factors:
- Comparative ease between two courts in enforcing any judgment
- If one of the two courts is more familiar with the governing law to apply
- Whether the judicial economy is best served by keeping or transferring
- Local interest in the case
- Private factors:
Plaintiff's selection of the initial forum is also afforded considerable weight.
Transfers between districts in a state are freely granted upon showing the convenience of witnesses, parties, and evidence.
A district court can transfer to cure venue. 28 U.S.C. § 1406
A district court can transfer to cure want of jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1631
- Convenience of parties and witnesses
Forum Non Conveniens
Forum non conveniens is when a court with jurisdiction declines to exercise it due to the fact that another court with equal jurisdiction is significantly more convenient for the parties.
Forum non conveniens causes a dismissal of a case despite the court having jurisdiction with the expectation that it will be re-filed in a more convenient court system.
It is usually only used in state courts as they lack the power to transfer to other states.
- The plaintiff's choice of forum gives a strong presumption. Piper.
- The law being better in the forum court is not enough to avoid forum non conveniens, but if a "remedy" is not available in the new forum, then substantial weight is given. Piper.
- It is up to the sound discretion of the court and reversed only if the court clearly abused that discretion.
- Private Factors:
- Relative ease of access to sources of proof
- Cost of litigation
- Availability and cost of compelling witnesses
- Ability to enforce the judgment
- Other problems like language issues
- Public Factors:
- Choice of law issues and familiarity of the court with the law to be applied
- Local interest in the case
- Backlog of respective courts
- Burden on local court and community in hearing a case not related to their forum
- Private Factors:
Removal
Removal allows defendants to move the entire case from a state court to a federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441.
Removal is only allowed if the district court would have had jurisdiction if the plaintiff chose district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441.
Removal is to the district court in the location where the state action was filed. 28 U.S.C. § 1441.
Hometown Rule
If based solely upon diversity, defendant cannot remove if he is a citizen of the state where action is brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2).
If based upon federal question and state law claims are also present, state claims which do not have subject matter jurisdiction are remanded back to state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c).
All defendants must agree to removal. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2).
Each defendant has 30 days from their service of complaint to remove. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
The amount is controversy for diversity after removal is the amount pled in the complaint unless it seeks non-monetary relief, the state court does not allow the inclusion of a dollar amount, or the state allows recovery beyond what is demanded in the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c).
Venue is automatic for the district court sitting in the locale of the state court action. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(f). But any party can file a motion to transfer the venue of the case to another district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1404.